
There is a version of the cobalt story that circulates widely in documentaries and news reports: children descending into unregulated shafts, hauling sacks of ore for a few dollars a day, while the metal eventually ends up in the batteries of premium electric cars. That version is real in places, and it should not be softened. But it is not the whole picture, and treating it as the whole picture leads to policies that can make life worse for the very people they intend to help.
Artisanal and small-scale mining, often abbreviated ASM, employs millions of people across sub-Saharan Africa. In the cobalt-rich provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, it is not a fringe activity. It is a primary income source for entire communities, supporting families, schools, and local commerce. Miners work independently or in small cooperatives, selling ore to traders who set prices that fluctuate with global markets. The work is dangerous, the pay is unpredictable, and the legal status of the activity is often ambiguous.
When international pressure mounts, the simplest response from companies is to stop buying from ASM sources altogether. This is called disengagement, and it sounds responsible. In practice, it pushes the activity further underground. Miners who lose access to formal buyers do not stop mining. They sell to informal traders, often at worse prices, with even less oversight. The result is a supply chain that is harder to monitor, not cleaner.
Disengagement also concentrates risk. If all responsible buyers exit, the remaining market is dominated by actors with no interest in safety or traceability. The miners themselves bear the cost. A better approach, according to many development organizations, is engagement with conditions: buying from ASM cooperatives that meet minimum standards, funding safety training, and paying a premium that makes formalization worthwhile.
Pilot programs in the DRC have shown that formalization is possible when three things align. First, miners need legal recognition, which requires governments to issue permits and define rights. Second, they need access to markets that pay fairly and consistently, which requires companies to commit to long-term purchasing. Third, they need support for basic safety, including ventilation, protective equipment, and training on tunnel stability.
None of this is charity. It is supply chain management that accounts for human reality. The electric vehicle transition will require enormous quantities of cobalt in the coming decade, and a significant portion will come from small-scale operations whether buyers like it or not. The ethical question is not whether ASM should exist. It is whether the people doing the work will have any power over the terms.